Half Moon Bay Review
 
 
 
 
 
TalkAbout Start a topic Login Create Login Forgot Password  
All Categories Around Town Elections Entertainment/Dining Schools
City Council Environment Sports Beyond the Coastside Catch All
Clay Lambert's Blog Mark Foyer's Blog Stacy Trevenon's blog Mark Noack's blog Bill Murray's Blog

More on Who Loves Illegals

Obama has the means and here's the motivation for what he's been doing:

Web Link ..... Illegal immigrants — along with other non-citizens without the right to vote — may pick the 2016 presidential winner. Thanks to the unique math undergirding the Electoral College, the mere presence of 11-12 million illegal immigrants and other non-citizens here legally may enable them to swing the election from Republicans to Democrats.


Comments

Maybe this belongs in the discussion, uff: "Immigrants taking all the jobs? Look again

Fun with critically important economic numbers", Web Link

"After the release of a miserable jobs report Friday, some have seen fit to claim that employment is rising only for immigrants, and plummeting for native-born Americans. But a closer look at the numbers reveals a different story."

"It is true that, according to the household survey, employment among native-born Americans slid from 124,314,000 in August to 124,052,000 in September. This came as the number of employed foreign-born American rose from 24,914,000 in August to 24,928,000 in September."

"But there's a problem with the "they took our jobs" storyline."

That's how that piece starts out. Worth the read.


They may have to back another candidate:

Web Link


Oops, make that:

Web Link


The linked article from the NY Post references Hilary's "legal adviser" which I presumes means an attorney.

Do you really think any reputable attorney would violate the attorney client privilege by speaking to the media about the advice he has given a client?


Then I guess you have nothing to worry about.

But you may want to recall that Mark Geragos had no trouble representing Scott Peterson after Geragos talked to the press about Peterson's legal needs.


— SENATE IMMIGRATION SUBCOMMITTEE RELEASES CHART PROVING IMMIGRATION WILL OUTPACE AMERICAN POPULATION GROWTH 7 TO 1 THROUGH 2065

..for every 1 net American born to today’s population—births minus deaths—the federal government will add 7 more people to the country through future immigration.

The Senate Subcommittee told Breitbart News:

October 3rd marked the 50th anniversary of the Immigration and Nationality Act. According to Pew Research, in the five decades since the Act’s adoption, 59 million immigrants have entered the United States. Pew further estimates that, including the descendants of those new arrivals, immigration policy added 72 million people to the population of the United States.

In 1970, fewer than 1 in 21 Americans were foreign-born; today, nearly 1 in 7 are foreign-born.

The United States has taken in four times more worldwide immigrants than any other nation on Earth. Over the next five decades, Pew projects that new immigration, including the descendants of those new immigrants, will add 103 million to the current U.S. population.

The net addition of 103 million new persons is exclusively the result of new immigration of persons not currently in the U.S. The 103 million figure does not include any immigrants currently in the U.S. or their future children. 


Why doesn't this administration and congress listen to its citizens?

Web Link? .... link to previous post.

"Polling from Kellyanne Conway shows that, by nearly a 10-1 margin, Americans of all backgrounds are united in their belief that companies should raise wages and improve working conditions for people already living in the United States – instead of bringing in new labor from abroad”


^^^ Why doesn't this administration and congress listen to its citizens? ^^^

Working for crony capitalists like Jeffery Immelt and the US Chamber of Commerce pays better.


The political machine is in bed with the Zuckerbergs, the Khoslas and the Gates of the world. Gotta keep the wealth and power accumulating in the hands of the few to the detriment of the many.

And to the extreme detriment of the US environment.


More noise. The attacks on Hillary simply point to the fact that she's the top candidate at this point, for better or worse. But the endless committees and the current FBI probe coming up snake eyes are solidifying her candidacy, not the opposite that the nattering weenies desire.


It's clear that "Coasters" is more impressed with a candidates genitalia than honesty, openness, competence and national security or protecting the American worker.

Whatever floats its boat.


I'll bet you Uff says nothing about your virulent sexism simply because she's a teabagger, too.


At least you're not denying that you're more impressed with a candidate's genetalia than their honesty, their openness, or their competence on national security issues or their willingness to protect the American worker.

But you did get to use a tired old platitude. How nice!


Coasters, if I'm not a male then how can I be a "teabagger?"


Gender confusion?


Coasters, your comment on sexism and tea bagging broke me up. As the saying goes

"Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug"

Remember, teabagging is a team sport.


^^^ Remember, teabagging is a team sport. ^^^

Sounds to me like you're speaking from experience.


Absolutely, Francis, Absolutely

.


Well surprise, surprise. I never knew anyone that bragged about such activity.


Francis you are a reactionary prude.

My friends and I often get together to bag Oolong, white, green and other teas to blend into different teas. We then compare and rate the flavor so and award prizes.

You should try it sometime.


It's nice to know you're interested in all colors and persuasions. Rating the flavor and awarding prizes however... eewww.


Moreon who loves illegals: Jerry Brown.

Web Link

Who here is dumb enough to think that illegals "accidentally" voting in US elections was not the goal of the CA Democrat Party in passing the new DMV programs which 1) have automatic voter enrollment through the DMV; and 2) give illegals a driver's license.


Put your tinfoil hat back on, Uff.


You're right, Pollyanna. The DNC would *never* stoop so low to expand its base. The constant push to attract illegals and offer licenses and handouts while harboring them in sanctuary cities has not a thing to do with a power grab by creating more voting Democrats. Nothing unethical ever happens in politics. Oh no.


Conspiracies are everywhere, including the one where Fox News sells you garbage and you regurgitate it.


It's clear that "Coasters" is more impressed with a candidates genitalia than honesty,

To be honest, I've never seen the genitalia of politicians. Perhaps someone with your taste for it can describe them, Francis?


Someone is itching for a fight. It's too bad that they're too stupid to use the new TA.


Oh, Francis, you rascal. Using the old TA to insult people about using the old TA. Aren't you the Bristol Palin of the Teabag set!


This TA site is a better place for snarking and keeping it off the Review's shiny new site.

BTW I still like this format better. The other site is a moving object and out of sequence.


Saw this today and thought it worth sharing, and here seems appropriate: "More Mexican immigrants leaving U.S. than entering: Pew", Web Link

"CHICAGO (Reuters) - More Mexicans are leaving the United States than entering it according to a report released on Thursday, at a time when some Republicans, including presidential candidate Donald Trump, have taken a hard line on illegal immigration."

"Most Mexicans leaving the United States are doing so voluntarily to reunite with their family or to start one, the report by the Pew Research Center showed."

Interesting, huh? Whodda thunk it?


That's astounding!


Yeah, I thought so too.

Seems to fly in the face of a couple of poster's comments here (and all over this board for over a year now). It can be so frustrating when the facts don't support the phobia, huh?

But of course it's a Syrian witch hunt we're all talking about now, so maybe this data on Mexican immigrants is old news. If so, somebody might want to provide The Donald with that info (and a few others).

We certainly wouldn't want anyone to be misinformed or get the wrong idea on US immigration, would we?


Add a comment

Please login to comment on this topic.

Login Here

Create a Login

Powered by Podium